Skip to main content

The Time for Defiance

What do you think is better, a Government who has full control or a Government with little control, in which most of the control goes to the people? Henry David Thoreau's piece, "Civil Disobedience", visits the topic of how a Government should really be. I agree with Thoreau when he says, "That Government is best which governs least." (Thoreau 382). This Laissez-Faire mentality gives full control to the people and allows for true freedom. By true freedom I mean that you have your own conscience and are not manipulated by the Government body. For example, many figures in the Government today are described as "not as men mainly, but as machines," (Thoreau 384). When someone fully gives into the way and the mentality of the Government, they lose their humanity and their true freedom, to the point where they are seen as machine-like. They lose their freedom of actions, thoughts, and voice. In the piece, Thoreau compares the Government to one big machine and he exclaims that in order to stop the continuous cycle and movement of this "machine", we, as citizens and free people, need to present a counter-friction and live our lives as we want to instead of how the Government wants us to. However, in order to do this, we all have to take a stand and make a sacrifice. So the real question is, are you willing to make that sacrifice?

Comments

  1. I loved how you started your blog post with a question and ended it with a question. The first question gave me something to think about while I read your post, and the last question, which was very strong, made me look inside myself.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I really like how you begin your post with a question. Even while reading it throughout, I still thought about it in my mind. I also liked how implemented the quote about relating the government as a machine, which made me think that instead of producing justice, the government producing injustice instead, and introduces common people's right to revolt against an unjust government.

    ReplyDelete
  3. One thing that stood out to me was the structure of your post. I liked how it starts with a question and ends with a question. I also liked how you integrated short quotes that were trimmed enough for the quote to get across an idea but not too short that it loses its value. Another thing I liked about your post is that it has a good purpose that suggests that we should actually make a change soon in our daily lives so that we can be taken seriously.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What's So Great About Poetry?

Poetry- the unit that most students dread to learn about in their English class. But why is poetry so disliked among high school students? A few of these reasons, and that I can attest for personally, are that poetry is seen as old, it can be quite difficult to understand/interpret, and we just fail to see the point of it. However, after interpreting some poems in class, my perspective began to shift (only slightly not significantly though). While I am still not the biggest fan of poetry, I am beginning to see a different side to it.  Yes, poetry is all of the negative things that I stated above (at least in my opinion) but once poetry is understood, the lesson becomes that much clearer and applicable. Understanding and correctly interpreting poetry is not only a beneficial skill to have but it also opens your eyes to a deeper understanding to things that are important in terms of culture, history, and etc. For example, poetry has effectively been used to advocate and teach about i...

Everlasting Mistakes: America Never Seems to Learn

America is essentially naive. We take what we want and we take what we have for granted. If something is going to propel our status up, whether it's for wealth, our social lives, or just out of selfishness, we don't seem to even hesitate to act. As we observe in Raymo's piece, the act of selfishness and naiveté is what drives their decisions, and eventually, will lead to their own death. The piece takes place in 1987, which is only around 25 years from when we learned how harmful cigarettes actually were. Just like in Raymo's piece when the six-year-old girl "rubbed the glowing dust on her body" not knowing that the "beautiful dust" would "damage her living cells" (Raymo 212) and kill her, our society did something quite similar and acted out of same naiveté. We did the same thing with tobacco and cigarettes and blindly rushed into using them because "they were cool" and "the new thing". Then once it was already too late...

"How Are You?" (I don't actually care though)

When we talk to people, we always seem to start our conversations with phrases such as, "how are you?" or "what's been going on with you lately?". But what is the purpose to asking these questions if the responses that we get back essentially don't mean anything to us? What are we getting from one-word answers like "good", "I'm fine", or just "yeah"? By nature, we ask these questions without actually caring about what the person answers back to us. However, I actually believe that these questions are of crucial use to us. For example, when your parents force you to meet someone like their "high school friend" and all you have to do is be polite, these questions are quite handy. You're able to fill awkward time and be polite at the same time. While it might seem cold-hearted to think this way, in reality, everyone does it. On the other hand, I'm sure there are some people who are asking these questions to ...