Skip to main content

Are You Marked or Unmarked?

A quote from Tannen’s piece that really stood out to me was “there is no unmarked woman.” (Tannen 556). I completely agree with this statement. While men can be marked too, the extremity to which women are marked in society doesn’t compare. Women are sexualized, categorized, and objectified by what they wear, what they look like, and how they act. Even if you say you don’t categorize people on how they look, act, etc., then you are lying because our society has shaped us to do it unconsciously. Especially to women. Personally, I do believe that there is such a thing as an unmarked man. Society has shaped us to be egocentric and when a man falls into our own personal stereotype-looking category, then we don’t think anything of them. On the other hand, there is no standard-looking category for women. Anything that a woman wears says something about her that makes us judge her right away, consciously and unconsciously. I believe that as time has gone on since this piece was published, we have learned to “mark” people more often. A variable that I think plays a much more significant role in our lives nowadays is sexual orientation (for both men and women). Through sexual orientation, people can be grouped into many different categories, this automatically gives them a label whether they want it or not. Overall, while Tannen’s piece gives the concept of “marking” a negative connotation, does that mean that it always has to be a negative thing? 

Comments

  1. I agree that everyone places judgements on others, even if they do it unconsciously. It's unfortunate that society puts so much importance on physical appearance.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with the statement as well, and it’s a good point to mention that there is no standard-looking category for women. Even if a woman were to try to dress completely unmarked, that would say something about her and she would get judged for it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I like how you took Tannen's claim and analyzed it for yourself in today's society. Personally, I believe that nobody can go unmarked. It may seem like some people are unmarked but that's only one person's perspective and if you look at it through a different lens I am confident that there is something that is marked about that person. I like how you ended with a question. Marking could be a positive thing, it just depends on how it is interpreted. Good job Sawyer.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What's So Great About Poetry?

Poetry- the unit that most students dread to learn about in their English class. But why is poetry so disliked among high school students? A few of these reasons, and that I can attest for personally, are that poetry is seen as old, it can be quite difficult to understand/interpret, and we just fail to see the point of it. However, after interpreting some poems in class, my perspective began to shift (only slightly not significantly though). While I am still not the biggest fan of poetry, I am beginning to see a different side to it.  Yes, poetry is all of the negative things that I stated above (at least in my opinion) but once poetry is understood, the lesson becomes that much clearer and applicable. Understanding and correctly interpreting poetry is not only a beneficial skill to have but it also opens your eyes to a deeper understanding to things that are important in terms of culture, history, and etc. For example, poetry has effectively been used to advocate and teach about i...

Everlasting Mistakes: America Never Seems to Learn

America is essentially naive. We take what we want and we take what we have for granted. If something is going to propel our status up, whether it's for wealth, our social lives, or just out of selfishness, we don't seem to even hesitate to act. As we observe in Raymo's piece, the act of selfishness and naiveté is what drives their decisions, and eventually, will lead to their own death. The piece takes place in 1987, which is only around 25 years from when we learned how harmful cigarettes actually were. Just like in Raymo's piece when the six-year-old girl "rubbed the glowing dust on her body" not knowing that the "beautiful dust" would "damage her living cells" (Raymo 212) and kill her, our society did something quite similar and acted out of same naiveté. We did the same thing with tobacco and cigarettes and blindly rushed into using them because "they were cool" and "the new thing". Then once it was already too late...

"How Are You?" (I don't actually care though)

When we talk to people, we always seem to start our conversations with phrases such as, "how are you?" or "what's been going on with you lately?". But what is the purpose to asking these questions if the responses that we get back essentially don't mean anything to us? What are we getting from one-word answers like "good", "I'm fine", or just "yeah"? By nature, we ask these questions without actually caring about what the person answers back to us. However, I actually believe that these questions are of crucial use to us. For example, when your parents force you to meet someone like their "high school friend" and all you have to do is be polite, these questions are quite handy. You're able to fill awkward time and be polite at the same time. While it might seem cold-hearted to think this way, in reality, everyone does it. On the other hand, I'm sure there are some people who are asking these questions to ...