Skip to main content

Is Eminent Domain Truly Beneficial?

"Aggressive use of eminent domain also damages the social fabric of poor communities because the displacement of residents, businesses, and churches undermines social ties."(Somin 6)
Eminent domain: the right of a government or its agent to expropriate private property for public use, with payment of compensation. However, in many cases, the government does not pay the right amount of compensation that they should be paying. While others might say that eminent domain is only productive and beneficial for communities, I believe that statement to be false. The government acts in the same, selfish way as a casino. Once you enter a casino, you are manipulated into spending more and more of your money, until you are left with nothing. Similarly, the government manipulates and takes whatever they want, no matter who it'll damage in the long run. When something is taken from you like this, you feel like they left you with hardly anything, sometimes even nothing. They manipulate and claim that their actions will only promote the community. However, while some are being benefitted, usually the dominant white race, others are left in the dust. In most cases of eminent domain, minorities are the ones that are most affected. While the white race may be viewing the benefits of eminent domain as something as great as Gandhi, the minorities could be viewing it as something as destructive as a bomb. When the government takes from them, they are left feeling like lone rangers, with no one to support them. I believe that part of this lack of attention towards minorities is due to racial profiling. While our government may claim to be accepting towards everyone, I think that they unconsciously perform actions that prove that that is quite not verisimilitude. The groups and movements against eminent domain spark a fire within minorities. Ultimately, with this fire spreading, change will occur. 

Comments

  1. Sai RavulaDecember 15, 2019 at 4:40 PM

    I liked how you used the casino in the puzzle in order to make an analogy with the United States, expanding upon your ideas with the metaphor. I didn't think of such an idea when doing my paragraph, as I can only link the word with casinos relating to eminent domain and development.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Kyle JungDecember 15, 2019 at 9:44 PM

    Good job Sawyer! I like how you talked about eminent domain using the second puzzle. It was interesting to see how you used all of those words in your blog especially since I talked about eminent domain too, just did the first puzzle. The usage of the specific words or phrases was very smooth and it flowed well. I especially like how you compared the actions of government to those of a casino.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What's So Great About Poetry?

Poetry- the unit that most students dread to learn about in their English class. But why is poetry so disliked among high school students? A few of these reasons, and that I can attest for personally, are that poetry is seen as old, it can be quite difficult to understand/interpret, and we just fail to see the point of it. However, after interpreting some poems in class, my perspective began to shift (only slightly not significantly though). While I am still not the biggest fan of poetry, I am beginning to see a different side to it.  Yes, poetry is all of the negative things that I stated above (at least in my opinion) but once poetry is understood, the lesson becomes that much clearer and applicable. Understanding and correctly interpreting poetry is not only a beneficial skill to have but it also opens your eyes to a deeper understanding to things that are important in terms of culture, history, and etc. For example, poetry has effectively been used to advocate and teach about i...
Post a Comment
Read more

Everlasting Mistakes: America Never Seems to Learn

America is essentially naive. We take what we want and we take what we have for granted. If something is going to propel our status up, whether it's for wealth, our social lives, or just out of selfishness, we don't seem to even hesitate to act. As we observe in Raymo's piece, the act of selfishness and naiveté is what drives their decisions, and eventually, will lead to their own death. The piece takes place in 1987, which is only around 25 years from when we learned how harmful cigarettes actually were. Just like in Raymo's piece when the six-year-old girl "rubbed the glowing dust on her body" not knowing that the "beautiful dust" would "damage her living cells" (Raymo 212) and kill her, our society did something quite similar and acted out of same naiveté. We did the same thing with tobacco and cigarettes and blindly rushed into using them because "they were cool" and "the new thing". Then once it was already too late...
2 comments
Read more

"How Are You?" (I don't actually care though)

When we talk to people, we always seem to start our conversations with phrases such as, "how are you?" or "what's been going on with you lately?". But what is the purpose to asking these questions if the responses that we get back essentially don't mean anything to us? What are we getting from one-word answers like "good", "I'm fine", or just "yeah"? By nature, we ask these questions without actually caring about what the person answers back to us. However, I actually believe that these questions are of crucial use to us. For example, when your parents force you to meet someone like their "high school friend" and all you have to do is be polite, these questions are quite handy. You're able to fill awkward time and be polite at the same time. While it might seem cold-hearted to think this way, in reality, everyone does it. On the other hand, I'm sure there are some people who are asking these questions to ...
2 comments
Read more